The OPG — Operations, Property & Governance All articles
Governance & Compliance

Before the Loss Adjuster Calls: A Pre-Agreed Protocol for the First 48 Hours of a Property Incident

The OPG — Operations, Property & Governance
Before the Loss Adjuster Calls: A Pre-Agreed Protocol for the First 48 Hours of a Property Incident

Photo: Thomas Nugent , CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Most owner-managed businesses discover their property incident protocol on the morning they need it. A pipe fails above the server room, a rear door is forced overnight, or a substation fault kills power to a chilled store — and suddenly a handful of people are making irreversible decisions at speed, by phone, with no record of who agreed what.

The loss itself is rarely the problem. The problem is what happens next: the clean-up team that disposes of the very evidence the insurer wanted to inspect, the maintenance spend authorised by someone with no delegated authority, the landlord notified four days late, or the RIDDOR report that was never made.

None of these are facilities failures. They are governance failures, and they are avoidable — provided the decisions are agreed in a quiet week rather than a wet one.

Why the first 48 hours are a board matter

An incident compresses the normal decision cycle into hours. In ordinary trading, a director's spending authority, the notification of a landlord and the recording of a decision are separate, comfortable processes. In an emergency they run simultaneously, often out of hours, often with the managing director unreachable on a flight.

Good governance in this context means one thing: nobody has to improvise authority. A short, one-page protocol — signed off at board level, held by the office manager and the caretaker as well as the directors — converts panic into procedure. It also creates the contemporaneous record that insurers, regulators and, occasionally, courts expect to see.

Hour one: safety before salvage

The protocol should open with the non-negotiable sequence, and it should be written in plain language so that a keyholder with no technical background can follow it.

  1. Protect people. Evacuate and account for anyone on site. Call 999 for fire, suspected gas, structural movement or intruders still present.
  2. Isolate. Electricity, gas and water at the mains where it is safe to do so — and only where the person is competent to do it.
  3. Secure the perimeter. Make the building wind- and water-tight, and secure against further entry, without disturbing the scene.
  4. Call the named contact. One designated incident lead, with a named deputy. Not a group chat.

The order matters. A tenant who begins moving stock before the electrical supply is confirmed safe has created a new risk, and quite possibly a new liability question.

The decision rights grid

This is the heart of the protocol and the part most SMEs lack entirely. In the absence of a pre-agreed schedule, staff either spend nothing and let damage spread, or spend freely and terrify the finance director. Both are expensive.

A workable model uses three bands, reviewed annually:

The grid should also state clearly who may not authorise expenditure: typically anyone with a conflict of interest, including a director connected to a contractor being engaged. A one-line conflict declaration in the incident log closes that gap cheaply.

Evidence capture: the discipline that pays for the claim

Insurers do not expect a tenant to preserve a building in aspic. They do expect a coherent account. The protocol should require, before any clearance begins:

Under the Insurance Act 2015, a policyholder owes a duty of fair presentation — an obligation that continues to shape how a claim is handled after the event. Deliberately withholding information, or quietly discarding the damaged stock before inspection, is exactly the conduct that turns an honest claim into a contested one.

Who must be told, and by when

Notification is where tenant-landlord relationships are won and lost. The protocol should name each party and the person responsible for contacting them.

The protocol should record the contact details for each of these, with out-of-hours numbers, in the same document. An insurer's claims line buried in a policy schedule three folders deep is not a protocol.

Standing the incident down

At the 48-hour mark, the incident lead should convene a short review — fifteen minutes is sufficient — covering four questions: is the site safe and secure; is the evidence complete; have all required parties been notified in writing; and what has been spent against which authority band.

The output is a one-page note to the board. It becomes the spine of the eventual claim, the basis for any service charge challenge from the landlord, and the starting point for whatever changes the incident has revealed.

The practical next step

Draft the protocol as a single side of A4, table it at the next board meeting, and have it signed by every director. Then test it once: ask the office manager to find the stopcock, the insurer's claims number and the landlord's emergency contact without help. The answers usually identify the gaps in twenty minutes. Discovering them then is considerably cheaper than discovering them at two in the morning with water coming through the ceiling.

All Articles

Related Articles

Custody of Keys: Governing Building Access When People Leave

Custody of Keys: Governing Building Access When People Leave

Who Decides When Interests Collide? A Conflict Register for the Owner-Managed Board

Who Decides When Interests Collide? A Conflict Register for the Owner-Managed Board

Decision Rights Without the Bottleneck: A One-Page Authority Matrix for a Small UK Board

Decision Rights Without the Bottleneck: A One-Page Authority Matrix for a Small UK Board